Wednesday 18 May 2011

CONGRESSIAONAL RESEARCH SERVICE REPORT FOR CONGRESS

UNITED STATES PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AFTER 9/11
The report focuses on renewed attention to public diplomacy (PD) and its importance in creating foreign public opinion about the United States (US). The report provides a historical background of PD tools such as the creation of the United States Information Agency (USIA) and the role of the Voice of America (VOA), together with other PD policies.

The negative perception of the Bush Administration in entering the Iraq war, as well as refusing to sign the Kyoto Protocol and Chemical Weapons Ban created a negative perception of the US and increased the importance of PD particularly coupled with the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Over time it became clear that it was necessary to co-operate and introduce America to the world to prevent negative perception. The report mainly focuses on the efforts on Islamic countries to renew the image of the US. In general the US always used PD to formulate public opinion. The Voice of America and the creation of USIA to administer the broadcasting and information programs, which had a huge influence on societies, are some examples. The US spent huge funds on PD but by the end of the 1990s the budget for PD was reduced, partly because of the abolishment of USIA and partly for budget austerity. However, its importance and the budget increased after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The 9/11 attacks pushed the US to reconsider their policies on Islamic countries, specifically on Arabic countries. The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which was created during the 108th Congress, aimed to promote free media in Islamic countries and create scholarships for Muslims to attend American sponsored schools. Every possible tool has been used to influence Muslim and Arab populations to combat terrorism. The International Information Programs (IIP) is just one of the diplomatic steps taken by the US. To reach larger Muslim and Arab populations the IIP developed new programs such as printing in Arabic three times more than before 9/11 and promoting an Arabic magazine and the creation of a Persian language website targeting the Iranian society. Similarly the 9/11 attacks forced Congress and the Administration to use Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) more efficiently.

Since the 9/11 attacks the importance of exchange programs has increased. According to the Department of State, about $175 million in funding has supported exchange programs in Islamic and Arabic countries. Similarly 49 Arab women who were politically or socially active in their own countries were brought to the US where they participated in many congressional and political issues. According to reports, religious tolerance has increased. Again, after 2001, the importance of broadcasting and communicating with the Islamic world was reconsidered. For example, the VOA increased its focus onto Afghanistan and the Middle East. Programs were run in Arabic to communicate with Arab society and try to win their hearts and minds. According to a survey conducted by VOA, 80% of adult males in Afghanistan listen to VOA and rank it highly for credibility and objectivity.

Today PD structure has changed and is used as a dialogue rather than a monologue to reach deeper and to rebuild long term relationships and mutual trust between the US and the Islamic world. Again US officials realized that positive public opinion can be very influential in combating terrorism. The efficiency of PD is a debatable subject. Today the importance of the internet and increasing numbers of educated people helps in the understanding of US policies and encourages people to question the reasons behind US efforts in Islamic countries. It seems that the 9/11 attacks cannot change the perception of Islam and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and the subsequent response of Bush as, “Operation Enduring Crusade” will not change the Islamic perception of the US.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Epstein. S. B. 2006, US Department of State: U.S. Public Diplomacy: Background and the 9/11 Commission Recommendations, Available from: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/66505.pdf, Accessed (11.05.2011)

Monday 16 May 2011

Club of Budapest International Foundation - critical analysis of a think tank report




Brief summery of the Foundation:





Ervin Laszlo (left) and Karan Singh (right) at the launching meeting, 28/29 July 2004

Club of Budapest International Foundation

Founded in 1993, the global Club of Budapest is an informal international association dedicated to developing a new way of thinking and a new ethics that will help resolve the social, political, economic, and ecological challenges of the 21st century. The idea of the Club of Budapest was developed in 1978, in a discussion between Aurelio Peccei, a founder and first president of the Club of Rome, and Ervin Laszlo, a systems philosopher and also a member of the Club of Rome at that time. They were convinced that the enormous challenges to humanity can only be dealt with through the development of a cultural and cosmopolitan consciousness. The successful merging of the two cities Buda and Pest is symbolized by the famous Chain Bridge. It visualizes our ambition to build bridges between generations, disciplines and cultures. Therefore, it was selected as the logo and signet for the objectives of the Club.Since 2008 the operational platform of the Club of Budapest is the WorldShift Network, which was established by Ervin Laszlo, Wolfgang Riehn and Johannes Heimrath in 2007 as an international foundation. It has its seat in Germany. In future the WorldShift Network will be responsible for the international projects of the Club as well as for the coordination of the National Clubs.

The four main Mission of the Club of Budapest are:

  • Promoting the emergence of planetary consciousness
  • Interconnecting generations and cultures
  • Integrating spirituality, science, and the arts
  • Fostering learning communities worldwide
During the years of 1996-2007 the Club of Budapest has received a serious of awards for the outstanding global consciousness in action. The prizes were in two main categories: Planetery Consciousness Award, and the Change the World-Best Practice Award.

The World Wisdom Council (WWC) has been convened with the Club of Budapest in cooperation of the World Commission on Global Consciousness to advocate that the world can constructively changed by women and men wherever they live, whatever their interests in their lives. The World Wisdom Council (WWC) is politically, socially and culturally non-partisan and it aims to inform people that they can move towards the world, where they can live in peace and harmony.

The Club of Budapest, currently has national branches in several countries, some of them are: Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hawaii, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Turkey, United States, and Venezuela.

On 29 November 2008, the Club of Budapest - with the cooperation of Ervin Laszlo and David Woolfson - worked out the "State of Global Emergency Declaration" by calling attention to the dangers as well as the opportunities that confront the human community. The Club of Budapest will also hold an upcoming event in Berlin on 03 June 2011, together with the European Leadership Academy (ELA) to promote global planetary consciousness in a sustainable world.




referencies:

www.clubofbudapest.org

Interpol: Diplomacy of the International Policing Systems?


Interpol: Diplomacy of the International Policing Systems?

The emergence of transnational criminal actors challenges national law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Global organised criminals are now involved in various crime activities, such as smuggling, theft, drug trafficking, money laundering, and most notably terrorism and cyber crime. These criminals can fuel domestic and international tensions, which undermine states actors and existing policing regimes, and calls for cooperation among various national police organisations.

Brief description of the Interpol:

Interpol – The International Criminal Police Organization - is the world’s largest international police organization, with 188 member countries. Created in 1923, it facilitates cross-border police co-operation and support and assists all organizations, authorities and services whose mission is to prevent and combat international cross-border crimes. Interpol’s aim is to facilitate international police co-operation, even when the diplomatic relations do not exist between particular states. Action is taken in the name of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Interpol’s constitution prohibits “any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character”. The President of Interpol and the Secretary General work closely together in order to provide a strong leadership and direction to the Organization. It compromises of 5 of its Constitution: General Assembly, Executive Committee, General Secretariat, National Central Bureaus, Advisers, The Commission for the Control of Interpol’s Files.

The Interpol’s six priority crime areas are: drug and criminal organizations, Financial and high-tech crime, Fugitives, Public safety and terrorism, Trafficking in human beings, Corruption. Interpol regularly releases media postings.

I found a really interesting piece on Bioterrorism. Interpol, with the support of the non-profit Alfred P. Sloan Foundation – an organisation that is non-for-profit institution based in New York City, established in 1934 by Alfred Pritchard Sloan, Jr. that support of original research and education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics – has developed a Bioterrorism Prevention Programme that aims to: raise awareness of the threat, develop police training programmes, strengthen and develop legislation, provide useful tools for police bio-related investigations. This Programme was launched in 2005 with the First Global Conference on Bioterrorism.

Bioterrorism is extremely dangerous globalised crime nowadays, with the possibility of terrorist attacks, using biological agents, represent an increasing concern for the involved law enforcement bodies, governments and public health officials around the world. The reason why that is the biological agents – such as bacteria, viruses and fungi – are significantly cheaper, and way easier to produce than those of conventional weapons or nuclear armaments. They are extremely difficult to detect and symptoms may not appear for hours or even days. The threat, posed by potential bioterrorists calls for international co-operation on many levels: from implementing appropriate legislation in order to criminalize bioterrorists acts, to creating teams on the local and national level.

Interpol’s response was to team up with the non -profit organisation to prevent bio-crimes. Interpol has published specific instructions and guidelines on Bioterrorism Pre-Planning, and is available to the Organization’s member countries. They have also created a workshop in October 2010 that had gathered experts from 23 countries, for bioterrorism prevention training for use at police systems worldwide has developed.


Bibliography:

www.interpol.int/Public

www.sloan.org

Michael Fooner: Interpol, issues in World Crime and International Criminal Justice, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York

Wednesday 11 May 2011

Public Diplomacy and NGOs




Medecines sans Frontieres (MSF) is an independent International organisation providing humanitarian medical aid in the countries where poverty, diseases, natural disasters and emergencies occur. It is primarily sponsored by private individuals therefore impartiality is the main characteristics of MSF charter.

Currently MSF have missions in over sixty different countries. Most recent ones include MSF missions in Libya, Ivory Coast, South Sudan, Japan to name a few.

One of the other aspects of the MSF charter is advocacy. From the very beginning of the mission the idea was to ‘speak out of the plight of the victims’ when a group of French doctors and journalists in 1971 helped victims of civil war in Nigeria. Today using advocacy MSF mobilises volunteers and doctors across the world.

Some may argue that public diplomacy is irrelevant to the work of the organisation. Considering that it does not carry any political agenda with its missions being independent and impartial and that its primary goal is to relief pain and suffering of people. However some academics as, for instance, Gregory argues that PD is a tool in the hands of state and non-state actors. Although not backed by government authority MSF has legitimacy and credibility to be part of global governance- actions towards shared values and therefore be part of public diplomacy process (Gregory B. 2008).

MSF workers may be called a citizen diplomats because they bring culture and most importantly the knowledge ( often Western standards) that create certain perceptions of Western culture in the recipient countries.

The following example may demonstrate that NGOs such as MSF play a vital role in international relations and some decisions of the organisation may affect people’s life.

MSF mission in Turkmenistan has been on the ground for 10 years. It has provided trainings for local doctors and nurses, supplied medical equipment and medical drugs and was about to launch a Tuberculosis Treatment Program however did not receive approval by the Turkmen government. After scraping the mission MSF has published a report describing the very poor condition of Turkmenistan Health care system and describing non-cooperation of local authorities with the MSF workers.

That has led to a little improvement in Turkmenistan Health care system. The president Gurbanguly Muhammedov has started a reform and rehabilitation of hospitals and clinics in the country. Nevertheless the changes are cosmetic. This example shows that although MSF has international recognition and credibility in some cases it has not enough power to change government policies.

http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/publications/article.cfm?id=4363&cat=special-report

http://www.msf.org.uk/about_history.aspx